As Maharashtra approaches crucial elections, the current government’s tactics raise questions about democratic integrity, corruption, and long-term progress versus short-term politics. The #Newsdesk reports…

As Maharashtra’s assembly elections draw near, the incumbent government, formed through mid-term defections, is under scrutiny for compromising democratic values and using divisive Hindutva politics. Accusations of corruption 'whitewashing,' last-minute financial handouts, and a coalition of fragmented parties have prompted many to question the government’s true commitment to Maharashtra’s development. Voters are therefore urged to assess if this government aligns with the state’s legacy of progressive, inclusive values, or if change is necessary to uphold democratic integrity and sustainable growth.

Maharashtra’s upcoming assembly elections come at a critical juncture, as the incumbent BJP-led alliance, Mahayuti, faces questions over its legitimacy and commitment to democracy. Formed through a controversial mid-term political realignment, the coalition has drawn criticism for employing central agencies to force party defections, while allegations of corruption against new allies seem conveniently disregarded. The government’s recent welfare handouts, strategically timed before elections, and a shift towards Hindutva politics raise further concerns about whether it truly represents Maharashtra’s progressive, inclusive values. A state most forward, safe for women, proud of its culture and welcoming to progressive people from across the country to live in and succeed, is suddenly under the threat of regressive ideas overtaking its historical position of having been the most powerful expression of a modern India. As Maharashtrians prepare to vote, many are evaluating if this coalition is capable of effective governance or if it’s time to restore democratic integrity and uphold Maharashtra’s storied legacy.

Here are five reasons why many citizens of the state believe that the incumbent Maharashtra government should be voted out in the upcoming assembly elections:

1. Undermining Democratic Integrity

The current government, formed mid-term by splintering key political parties (like the Shiv Sena and NCP) through coercive tactics and corruption probes by agencies, has set a dangerous precedent. This form of political engineering not only undermines the democratic mandate but also casts doubt on the legitimacy of governance. Such moves compromise the spirit of democracy by showing that power can be attained by forcing opponents to shift allegiances rather than respecting the public’s electoral choice. Yes, it can be argued that the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) was also formed after the previous elections and therefore it is not exactly the mandate of the people, but the counter to it is that the MVA was well within its legal rights to do so (also the Shiv Sena – now UBT – no longer agreed with the Hindutva of othering minorities and the excluded communities that the BJP was promoting) and did not use control over ED and CBI to do so.

2. Corruption Allegations and ‘Whitewashing’ for Political Gains

Leaders who were under investigation for corruption by central agencies have seemingly been “whitewashed” upon joining the BJP-led alliance. This selective application of legal scrutiny, where charges are downplayed or ignored once political loyalties shift, indicates a disregard for accountability and transparency. Voters are left questioning whether corruption allegations are genuine or merely tools for political manipulation, eroding trust in the institutions meant to uphold justice.

3. Short-Term Handouts Over Long-Term Development

The Laadli Bahen scheme, providing Rs 1500 monthly to women, is a recent handout rolled out close to the elections with a promise to continue if the government is re-elected. While welfare programs are essential, their strategic timing and conditional continuation raise concerns about using public funds for vote-buying rather than creating sustainable programs. Maharashtrians are discerning and can see through such tactics, understanding the need for policies that deliver genuine economic and social development over political gimmicks.

4. Hindutva Politics Over Maharashtra’s Progressive Values

While Hindutva politics might find resonance among certain demographics, Maharashtra has historically been a state of progressive, inclusive values. Known for its contributions to theatre, cinema, and the arts, the state has a rich legacy of social reform, inclusivity, and forward-thinking. The Mahayuti’s focus on hardline Hindutva risks sidelining these values, undermining the pluralistic and diverse heritage that has shaped Maharashtra’s identity as a cultural and intellectual leader in India.

5. A Fragile Coalition of Self-Interest Over Governance

The Mahayuti alliance is built on a fragile coalition of splintered groups bound by self-interest rather than a shared vision for Maharashtra’s future. The opportunistic alliances and shifting loyalties suggest that governance may be compromised by internal conflicts, with leaders more focused on retaining power than addressing the state’s pressing issues, like farmer distress, job creation, and infrastructure development.